Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/anime/public_html/banzai/header.php:34) in /home/anime/public_html/banzai/includes/sessions.php on line 254
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/anime/public_html/banzai/header.php:34) in /home/anime/public_html/banzai/includes/sessions.php on line 255
Anime-Source.Com: Forums
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/anime/public_html/banzai/header.php:34) in /home/anime/public_html/banzai/includes/page_header.php on line 499
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/anime/public_html/banzai/header.php:34) in /home/anime/public_html/banzai/includes/page_header.php on line 501
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/anime/public_html/banzai/header.php:34) in /home/anime/public_html/banzai/includes/page_header.php on line 502 Anime-Source.com :: View topic - communism vs. facism
Joined: Mar 08, 2005 Posts: 295 Location: the voice in teh back of your mind...
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:56 pm Post subject: communism vs. facism
in your opinion which is worse?
being a communist country or being a facist country
i think facists are worse
(just because hitler was one) _________________ Mortified: To cause or to experience shame, humiliation, or wounded pride.
synonyms; humiliate
if u don't get it you will...
(buhawhahwahawhaaa!!!!)
Both are horrible but communism is the worst because it talks of a great cooperation between people of the country but in the end its just lies and corruption. Fascism is at least upfront about what it is.
Joined: Oct 03, 2005 Posts: 271 Location: in a turkey
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:28 pm Post subject:
first things first do u guys understand the principle of communism, to tell u the truth i think that communism is great if it could work out. COZ it's main principle is equality but i like socialism which is the same thing but i can own private property so i think faschism is worse
first things first do u guys understand the principle of communism, to tell u the truth i think that communism is great if it could work out. COZ it's main principle is equality but i like socialism which is the same thing but i can own private property so i think faschism is worse
Except true Communism is basically impossible to achieve, making it a flawed idea for a society and government in the first place. Everytime a nation has tried to switch to true Communism, it always gets bogged down midstage since the central government at that time is unwilling to give up power.
I don't particularly believe either one is bad.
In honesty, people's opinion of Fascism, and Communism are quite biased due to the cold war, and the world wars. Both are only ideologies, and like any idea can be taken to extremes where they then become bad. The truth of communism is that it doesn't work because there isn't enough money to go around. As well it deprives people of the rights they have to vie for something material in life. Fascism is on the opposite side of the scale. Neither is particularly bad, but only when you take them to the extremes as has happened in the last century do you end up with the results we have seen.
I don't particularly believe either one is bad.
In honesty, people's opinion of Fascism, and Communism are quite biased due to the cold war, and the world wars. Both are only ideologies, and like any idea can be taken to extremes where they then become bad. The truth of communism is that it doesn't work because there isn't enough money to go around. As well it deprives people of the rights they have to vie for something material in life. Fascism is on the opposite side of the scale. Neither is particularly bad, but only when you take them to the extremes as has happened in the last century do you end up with the results we have seen.
Um.... I don't see how you can spin Fascism in a positive way.... Having a despot in charge of a country, even if he's a competent administrator, does not bode well for such things like civil liberties and social mobility.
And communism has never been tried in any country, so how would you know if it's worse than fascism?
Please do not write comments and rantings about stuff you know nothing of.. _________________ "It is also paradox that the earth moves round the sun, and that water consists of two highly inflammable gases. Scientific truth is always paradox, if judged by every-day experience, which catches only the delusive appearance of things."
-Karl Marx
Joined: Mar 26, 2005 Posts: 8282 Location: stuck in tard tard land
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:46 am Post subject:
Thats the one big flaw Communism has...its too easaly corrupted...the government isnt held accountable to its actions....
But anyways....in terms of history...both are as bad as each other....in terms of ideologies...both have their merits...both have their faults.....just like any form of governemnt.....but none are actualy that stable and of course...dont realy hold up the principles of basic rights and equality to all men......
Joined: Aug 05, 2005 Posts: 3228 Location: Jack lives here
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:21 am Post subject:
Fenix wrote:
And communism has never been tried in any country, so how would you know if it's worse than fascism?
But even under ideal conditions, would Communism be achievable? and even then, maintainable? The mass proletariat or peasant uprising is a myth. It takes an avant garde elite to motivate, organise and educate a revolution out of anarchy. Any state must interact and survive within the global community. In this environment a state must progress. How does a socialist government generate productivity? it tightens the screws, buttons down the hatches, the people must work harder, longer and for less money! If these people dont want to do what the higher ups tell them to do, then the government must strengthen its machinery of coercion and propaganda. It makes the moves towards a totalitarian form of government.
Socialism raises some interesting questions. Is cooperation always more efficient than competition? Does equality really protect minorities or does it encourage homogeneity and a majority rules mentality? What place do voices of dissent and argument have in a society which operates on values of discipline and total support?
A part of Chaos Theory* is that disorder is actually order when viewed from far away. A system undergoing continual destruction and reconstruction is able to adapt to new situations which would thwart a system based on brittle rigidity.
Im not defending fascism. Only debating communism
*most of my knowledge of this comes from reading Jurassic Park 1 and 2. Still, Chaos Theory is one of my favourite things to reference alongside Freud. I think it makes me seem smarter
And communism has never been tried in any country, so how would you know if it's worse than fascism?
But even under ideal conditions, would Communism be achievable? and even then, maintainable? The mass proletariat or peasant uprising is a myth. It takes an avant garde elite to motivate, organise and educate a revolution out of anarchy. Any state must interact and survive within the global community. In this environment a state must progress. How does a socialist government generate productivity? it tightens the screws, buttons down the hatches, the people must work harder, longer and for less money! If these people dont want to do what the higher ups tell them to do, then the government must strengthen its machinery of coercion and propaganda. It makes the moves towards a totalitarian form of government.
Socialism raises some interesting questions. Is cooperation always more efficient than competition? Does equality really protect minorities or does it encourage homogeneity and a majority rules mentality? What place do voices of dissent and argument have in a society which operates on values of discipline and total support?
I think most of your thoughts about communism is based on the Soviet Union, which WASN'T communism. I say it again; the Soviet Union was NOT communism. The Soviet Union was leninism and stalinism, not marxism. Marxism today has already abandoned the evolved marxism like leninism, and are looking back at Karl Marx' original marxism.
According to historical materialism, the revolution of the proletariat will come eventually after a long enough period of capitalism. When you think of how long the feudalistic system lasted before capitalism broke through, then it will probably take just as long time, if not more, before communism will be achieved.
Today, the democracy is already being unstable. It is more a mass opinion system than democracy. This development (right word?) started after the first world war, which was "the war to end all wars".
How the capitalistic system will progress and if we will forsake democracy is unknown to us know, we can only guess.
I've studied historical materialism and the change from feudalism to capitalism was unavoidable. This was a natural evolution. Noone really triggered it. The same will probably be true for the next revolution; the revolution of the proletariat, which will result in the dictatorship of the proletariat.
About which is most efficient, competition or co-operation? No one knows. But this doesn't mean there can't and wont be any competition a socialist state, acually the backbone of historical materialism is based on Hegels' dialectic, which short means: the negation of the negation, which also is kind of competition (explained this in another thread).
About the money and motivation, this isn't true. What you say is based on the Soviet Union.
The problem today is, that people don't know anything about communism or marxism. They think the truth is what they've heard in the radio and from their parents. Don't believe this; it is propaganda!
The thruth is; the capitalistic goverments around the world uses just as much propaganda as the old 'communist' countries. As the British Encyclopedia once wrote about democracy: There should be no tolerence for people not supporting the democracy, meaning if you don't believe in the democracy you're a fucker (guess I'm a fucker ^^).
What I wrote here are only fragments of basic marxism, I don't know if it's all clear to the people who don't know much about it. If you want to know more you can read the paper I've made about marxism (though that's in danish ^^).
Back on topic: With communism out of the picture, only fascism is left. About how bad fascism is, I do not know. I know aboslutely nothing about fascism, other than that it was used in Italy ;_; _________________ "It is also paradox that the earth moves round the sun, and that water consists of two highly inflammable gases. Scientific truth is always paradox, if judged by every-day experience, which catches only the delusive appearance of things."
-Karl Marx
Joined: Aug 05, 2005 Posts: 3228 Location: Jack lives here
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:36 am Post subject:
Yeah my knowledge of communism comes from studying the history of the Russian Revolution school and from assimilating some stuff about Chinese history.
i understand that countries have taken leaps to actively bring about communism instead of waiting for a gradual change. i made the assumption that the change had to be stimulated because i find it hard to imagine a gradual transition from capitalism to communism. Will it gradually spread from country to country? Is it possible for you to quickly explain some of the theory behind your post? historical Materialism in particular. is communism the last stop and is there such thing as historical progress?
I find the eventual existence of communism hard to swallow. it reminds me of the end of evangelion in a way. A system like that denies humanity. its like going back to being apes.
sorry i dont read Danish
i dont mind if you explain things out in a PM if you need to write a lot or think youre going off topic
edit: about historical materialism, a quick squiz at Wikipedia jogged my memory back to learning about various schools of historical thought. Im over my head i know that its basically posing that material circumstances form the base of interaction and thought but i dont have a deep enough understanding to debate theory.
Ok, first off no one seems to know what facism is, which really isn't suprising cause it's not really a government system. It's just basically the worst possible direction a government can take. It's when there is one dicator, usually whith popular apeal. A secret service to control the people and propoganda to motivate and crentralize interests. The government usually has to identify and external and internal enemy to keep the people undercontroll by directing their aggression. Also the goverment and the economy a extremely closely tied like the economy controls the government or vice verca depending on how you look at it. Actually for the most part Communist nations esentially become facist. Especially Russia, facism is just really bad evil government and people powertiping ; that's all it means in common language
Now Communism is a whole diffent ball park. Is it better than facism, hell yes, Ideally, but the fact that it very rapidly and very commonly becomes facism means that it's not really that much bettter.
See. All government systems ideally work perfectly. Democracys could be intelligent and decisive and uncorrupt but they are in really life slow, ponderous and ridden with corruption because the evil power hunger people are the ones that vie for positions in the government. Monarchys are excellent when you have a competent ruler. The rule with governments is it all depends on the people and how good or bad they are.
So then the only way to truly guage the good or bad of a government systme is on how well is motivates its public to do the right things, and also based on who is in power. Communism is bad because it put's in place force which imediatly lend themselves to facism and corruption in the higher echelons of society and lazyness in the lower echelons. And I know there's not suposed to be classes in Communism but someone has to rule and someone has to work.
who' bright idea was it to say that facisim which states that any and all free will is evil, had killed hundreds of thousands of people just for the fuck of it, over communisim which states that all people shold be able to live comfortably, freely, and free of corporate oppression, look at cuba, they have a 100% literacy rate, free health care for all, and the vast majority of the population is extremely happy with itself
Joined: Nov 19, 2003 Posts: 237 Location: the end of the world....no really...serious here...
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:04 pm Post subject:
Both are horrible, i find it outrageous the mere fact that someones try to impose a way of thinking by force.
okay someones saying we know nothing about communism so let me make it clear for you:
communism is based off in the materialist dialectic(wich in itself is an absurd, but whatever), and proposes that everything derives from conflict, just as the socratic method of arguing, when a thesis confronted an antithesis and derived in a sinthesis, and at the same time denies anything thats not material. From this point of view he states that history as lived the same process, so that each different stage in human history comes from a previous revolution. at some point, capitalism will be thrown over for communism, just as feudal society was. thats what the marxism is IN A GENERAL VIEW.
according to marx, communism would be like natural state of humanity, where everyone has access to anything and where everyone cooperates with everyone.
the problem with comunism is that its empty, its not supported in anything, so it cannot go well for human beings. i personally believe, with reasons, and a lot of thinking, reading and studies, that communism is not a good choice, the theory is really full of holes, not just marx's, but also gramsci's and foucault's, and im talking about IMPORTANT holes, i mean, i know no theory is perfect, for ive studied a lot of political theories on governments and human conduct, but i can honestly say communism has some of the biggest problems in their ideology.
and ifnally, communism ends up being the very same thing every communist attacks time after time: a power speech, from the higher social classes to the lower, just more power imposing and no actual difference between that and people trying to convince you that democracy is alright. if you ask me, the whole "speeches speech" is ridiculous, for its impossible to even talk without trying to say something, so its absurd, but i want you to remember too, that communists thinkers were the ones who started pointing them out.
please feel free to disagree with me, but i just wanted to clearify that some of us do know what we are talking about here, so ill aprecciate if you didnt make derogatory expressions such as "you dont know what youre talking about" in the future, and even if some people dont, i dont think its the most appropriate way.
PS: i dont like democracy either, but i just wanted to focus on communism. _________________ Go to a restaurant and order a chicken and an egg. See wich comes first.
[IMG:200:150:9f0741ced5]http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e157/Estinto/1048319821_tokushitsu.jpg[/img:9f0741ced5]
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All images and comments are property of their respective owners, all the rest � 2002 by Anime-Source.com.
You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php.