| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
xenon10 Jikan Samurai

Joined: Oct 25, 2005 Posts: 933 Location: Cebu, Philippines
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
is that all? hmmm...politics been forgotten ever since the victory of paqciao. they're even planning in making him a hero of our country. even if i'm a fan of his, i stil dont think he's fit enough to be a hero. it'll probably boost his ego. i prefer making him in his own humble way.
it's really hard here. there are so many beggars and poor people everywhere you turn. food is precious for them and would do anything to get some, thats why stealing here is a profession. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
quosimos uncommoner

Joined: Aug 05, 2005 Posts: 3228 Location: Jack lives here
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tax money is already being squandered on fantastic new toys for the defence force, on new roads instead of public transport, on generous payouts to retired ministers. Now they tell me its also going to be used providing for my mum and dad. Jesus Christ... Why dont we just shovel the money into a furnace? I cant think of a worse way to spend money.
I think they should make death the only condition upon which a person can leave the work force. muahahahahaha! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MrPink Conscript

Joined: Oct 14, 2005 Posts: 102 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Population delcline is a good thing... sorta but it's often misinterpreted because people see it and think oh good there's less people around, more natual recsources for me. But the thing is that as population growth rates go down energy usage percapita goes up. and by energy i mean food, gas, oil, electricity, everything. So acutally the total amount of stuff that humanity is demanding of the world is getting bigger and bigger. Population would have of be ridiculously small for the world to be sustained at the US standard of living for everyone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bowser The Very Lonely Wolf

Joined: Mar 26, 2005 Posts: 8282 Location: stuck in tard tard land
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| quosimos wrote: |
I think they should make death the only condition upon which a person can leave the work force. muahahahahaha! |
They might as well....it seems the age of retirement is going higher and higher...well in the UK anyways....and once you finaly get there (if you havnt died already), there's hardly any retirement money to live off, never mind having fun with.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vanglo Heimin (Commoner)

Joined: Dec 21, 2005 Posts: 76
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| We can't live forever. And overpopulation is just as bad for our enviroment as pollution. Think about it, if poplulation kept going up that would cause a problem with our natural resources. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChiNammer Conscript

Joined: Sep 06, 2005 Posts: 118
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think it's inevitable. The world can only sustain so much. There is limited space for both living and growing food. Once the land is over populated, that leaves room for diseases to spread along with insufficient supplies to meet the demands of the population. Even if those things don't wipe us out, there are always greedy people that would kill others to achieve or attain something. This is why there were two world wars. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
theone06 Ronin Samurai

Joined: Sep 01, 2005 Posts: 795 Location: between here and there
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If the ppl are dying then lets make some more babies. Remember over poulation is not just having too many ppl but too many ppl relative to resources. Besides there are still places that a underpopulated  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tex_Arcana Conscript

Joined: Dec 30, 2005 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xristyan wrote: |
Do you think the governments will ever come up with a conspiracy to wipe out all those homeless people like exterminating all those people and their families with income below this point or that... that would surely eliminate the unemployment rate and poverty... though i don't want that to happen right now.. i might be one of those to be exterminated..  |
Shut up and eat your Soylent Green. (j/k, I couldn't resist that line from Futurama)
Actually, my answer to overpopulation and redistibution of resources has alwas been ........TO EAT THE RICH!!! _________________ "Though I am not naturally honest, I am so sometimes by chance."
- William Shakespeare
"Well, I think if you say you're going to do something and don't do it, that's trustworthiness."
-George W. Bush |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
quosimos uncommoner

Joined: Aug 05, 2005 Posts: 3228 Location: Jack lives here
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
youre joking. it should be the other way round: feed the poor to the rich! now thats an idea, albeit a bad one. Theres plenty of cows and pigs and chickens and shit so rich people neednt go around eating the poor.
instead of buying small islands in the Pacific like Taiwan and Tasmania, the rich should be forced to fight for them using their own personal armies made up of...tah dah! > the homeless, the destitute and the senile!
it'll be a grand bloodsport which takes the scum and the filth off our streets, culls the population, entertains, rakes in money for the tv networks which have coverage rights. Makes rich people richer and happier and poor/old people deader and unhappier (which wont matter cause theyre dead).
you could probably ship them off the Iraq, Iran, N Korea, China and any other country that needs to be invaded. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spankit A-Source Staff


Joined: Jan 29, 2006 Posts: 4562
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wow really a decline?
i thought there was a rising population due to
india and all other countries.
i dont think anything or much of it other than the fact that its
sad the working class (mainly us) will have to support a larger
aging population than the rest. i feel sorry for china though,
although the one child policy really helps supress the births that
are occuring in china their kids are gonna suffer from trying to
support such an insanely large population. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
quosimos uncommoner

Joined: Aug 05, 2005 Posts: 3228 Location: Jack lives here
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i feel sorry for the guys in China. because of the one child policy the male to female ratio of younger generations is horrendous ugh! i cant even stand to look at it poor bastards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
silverkitsune Daimyo

Joined: Sep 01, 2005 Posts: 1818 Location: Milk comes in bags here.
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Many rich countries with high standard of living are the ones that are experiencing low population growth.
Third world countries on the other hand are experiencing high birth rate and high death rate.
Low population growth would only be a worry for the neoclassical economists that only cares about consumerism.
The world population is still increasing steadily, right now at 6.5 billion, it's expected to reach an equilibrium around 10 billion in 50 years from now. That is pretty frightening in my opinion. That's like dumping another whole earth human population into the existing earth. _________________ [IMG:258:200]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v435/ypark/sigs/3fsn.png[/img] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spankit A-Source Staff


Joined: Jan 29, 2006 Posts: 4562
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah and all the first world counties'
main increase in population is immigration such
as canada, but the thing about is we use the point
system that only takes in educated working people
and even if they get here their degrees is as good as
nothing. not to mention taking in the middle aged
will also add to the older population. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tex_Arcana Conscript

Joined: Dec 30, 2005 Posts: 105
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| quosimos wrote: |
| youre joking. it should be the other way round: feed the poor to the rich! now thats an idea, albeit a bad one. Theres plenty of cows and pigs and chickens and shit so rich people neednt go around eating the poor. |
Actually, in a way the rich have been feeding off the poor for a very long time.
No I did mean eat the rich. Then redistrbute their wealth (they don't need it any more) then those that are greedy and grab most of the redistributed wealth become the new main course. Eventually enougth wealth and resources will be freed up and evenly distrubted so there will no longer be any problems with over population, poverty or strained resources, not to mention getting rid of a lot of anal perforations, lawyers and pollititians.
Social engineering at it's finest. _________________ "Though I am not naturally honest, I am so sometimes by chance."
- William Shakespeare
"Well, I think if you say you're going to do something and don't do it, that's trustworthiness."
-George W. Bush |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xristyan THE Forumer®


Joined: May 09, 2005 Posts: 21728 Location: At the Left Coast of The Maple Leaf
|
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the poor don't have work so they got nothing else to do but make babies... as for the rich countries they are so busy with being rich they can't have time or the mindset to have babies...
but still the population is declining and overall i think its good... after the baby boomers die out then i guess the load of taking care of their dying asses will be gone and the younger generation can take it easy for a moment... until another baby boom happens in this era... _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|