Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/anime/public_html/banzai/header.php:34) in /home/anime/public_html/banzai/includes/sessions.php on line 254
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/anime/public_html/banzai/header.php:34) in /home/anime/public_html/banzai/includes/sessions.php on line 255
Anime-Source.Com: Forums
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/anime/public_html/banzai/header.php:34) in /home/anime/public_html/banzai/includes/page_header.php on line 499
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/anime/public_html/banzai/header.php:34) in /home/anime/public_html/banzai/includes/page_header.php on line 501
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/anime/public_html/banzai/header.php:34) in /home/anime/public_html/banzai/includes/page_header.php on line 502 Anime-Source.com :: View topic - School shootings
Related thread here I still think the topic is different enough to keep this open, at least for a while, but bear in mind the other one as well.
Anyway, I don;t think that the solution lies in moving legal age requirements up, since I don't think the problem is young people owning guns; it's stupid people getting access to them. How are you going to regulate that? It doesn't matter how far up you move the legal age if a kid can just steal his dad's gun anyway. Just as effective, and even cheaper than buying.
Moving up the legal age requirement to prevent school shooting would be as effective as selling fans as a permanent solution to global warming. _________________
Joined: May 09, 2005 Posts: 21728 Location: At the Left Coast of The Maple Leaf
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:33 pm Post subject:
I don't think there will be any point in putting up the legal age for gun ownership... the ones that want to shoot will always be able to access them...
the source of the problem isn't the gun... its the person... and the environment that shaped him to be the killer that he is... _________________
Joined: Jan 02, 2007 Posts: 683 Location: Czech Republic
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:00 pm Post subject:
I agree that moving the line up won't solve whole the problem. But I think it will help somehow. Not everybody from those that are owning a gun and uses it in school will search for a gun elsewhere just to do it. Not all, but some cases happened just because some "idiot" had his own gun at home and he took it with him to school. Some of the people would be simply too lazy to get the gun in some more difficult way. Sometimes it's just a hot-head that would calm down if it won't get to the gun immediately (or the day after).
Second thing is the gun of parents. In my case, I absolutely have no idea whether my father has a gun or not (and he was in military) and I have no idea where he could be hiding it if he has some. If some child knows that his parent has a gun and it even knows where, then the parents did a HUGE mistake and they should pay for that as well. Some punishment for allowing access to the gun to 3rd person or something like that.
So once again, I think that moving the line up will help at least a bit. If it helps to reduce killing at least by 1 person per year, then it's good. We must start somewhere, don't we? _________________
So once again, I think that moving the line up will help at least a bit. If it helps to reduce killing at least by 1 person per year, then it's good. We must start somewhere, don't we?
I bet you support the current high level of airport security as well? The problem is that too many Americans are willing to sacrifice some of their freedom for the illusion of safety and security.
We don't need gun laws... We need to eliminate bullies or stop them. Less bullies = less school shootings, no? If you dare to disagree show me your logic.
If you dare claim "survival of the fittest" when I suggest that bullies are the problem... then we can use the same logic in the aftermath of a school shooting. Survival of the fittest indeed.
Some people will dislike me for saying this, but the truth must be heard. Most of these people who were shot were not innocent victims. Columbine? They shot people who made fun of them. I was in that spot as well. I know full well what it is to get to the point where you snap. I had even created a plan when I was around 15 years old to go into school, shoot a couple people who picked me really bad, then planned my suicide afterwords. However, this was back in 2000 and the FBI had actually intercepted my message and they had an agent contact my school, I went into a mental hospital and now I have alot more patience.
Yet, I do not blame those who would shoot up a school. As Barney from half-life said when you pissed him off, "I can only take so much, and no more. *bang.*"
Joined: Feb 15, 2008 Posts: 126 Location: Los Angeles
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:37 pm Post subject:
I guess I'm on the fence with this one.
The right to bear arms was established during frontier times to facilitate two things:
-hunting
-militia
Hunting is self-explanatory, but what a lot of people don't seem to realize is that in the early days of the Western expansion of the former colonies, the newborn United states didn't have the means to protect itself from the natives or competing nations seeking to appropriate that area into their own colonial bodies. Basically, the army of the USA was originated in this ideal. A number of militias would each over see a particular jurisdiction of the colonial states and facilitate expansion to the west and the south.
After the formal establishment of the US Army, the militias and this right to bear arms continue to exist, though to a much lesser degree than before.
That being said, I disagree with guns in these modern times wholeheartedly unless they are being used for war or hunting. Civilians shouldn't have to worry about arming themselves to go to the grocery store or take a nap because a few bad apples wanna put holes in stuff with a semi-automatic boomstick.
I think the question you are posing is a moot point, only because guns are readily available through the black market anyway. _________________ "Listen, when you're hurting someone don't think of the pain that he feels. Only concentrate
on the pleasure of causing him pain. That's the only way to show true compassion for your partner." --Kakihara
Joined: Jan 02, 2007 Posts: 683 Location: Czech Republic
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 4:06 am Post subject:
Sonozaki wrote:
I bet you support the current high level of airport security as well? The problem is that too many Americans are willing to sacrifice some of their freedom for the illusion of safety and security.
You can't gain something without losing something else. At least not in our society. I don't agree with you that it creates just an "illusion" of safety and security. Such restrictions and laws aren't making you safe for 100% of course, but are they're increasing the safety level you have. No law can eliminate the bad things totally, but it can limit it to some lower level. If people are awaiting something, what will make them safe and secure, they won't get it, because such thing doesn't exist. They can get only something what will make them safer and more secure than before. From your usage of "illusion", it seems that you're one of the people awaiting 100% safety, and if it doesn't make you safe for 100%, than it isn't good enough. Just my opinion
Quote:
We don't need gun laws... We need to eliminate bullies or stop them. Less bullies = less school shootings, no? If you dare to disagree show me your logic.
I agree with you only in the second half of the point, we needs to stop bullies. But what to do with bullies we doesn't succeed in stopping them? For such cases there is a gun law that will make the way for the bully at least a bit more difficult when we already fail to stop him. The fact we have gun laws doesn't mean we're not trying to stop/eliminate bullies in some other way already as well.
Quote:
If you dare claim "survival of the fittest" when I suggest that bullies are the problem... then we can use the same logic in the aftermath of a school shooting. Survival of the fittest indeed.
Sorry, I'm not English speaking and although I translated the paragraph, I didn't understand its point.
Quote:
Some people will dislike me for saying this, but the truth must be heard.
Not the truth, just you opinion.
Nobody is in the position to claim his own opinion as the truth and the opinion of others as false.
Quote:
Most of these people who were shot were not innocent victims. Columbine? They shot people who made fun of them. I was in that spot as well. I know full well what it is to get to the point where you snap. I had even created a plan when I was around 15 years old to go into school, shoot a couple people who picked me really bad, then planned my suicide afterwords. However, this was back in 2000 and the FBI had actually intercepted my message and they had an agent contact my school, I went into a mental hospital and now I have alot more patience.
If somebody kill several people in the school selectively, then well, I agree they probably were not so innocent and they had to do something to make the shooter lost his control. When somebody goes crazy and kills half of the class because just five children was making fun of him, then there were innocent victims as well. Innocent victims or not, nobody of them deserved to be killed. Even if we take "eye for eye, tooth for tooth" philosophy, then we don't get a permission for killing them as well. Act of killing those people exaggerated the punishment they deserved several times.
No one has a right to take life of somebody else. You didn't give him the life, you have no right to take it away. _________________
Joined: Apr 19, 2007 Posts: 678 Location: Currently in the Land of Anime and Manga
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:10 pm Post subject:
There are a myriad of problems facing gun control both domestically and abroad. I am the first to admit, however, that the US faces more and greater problems in this area than almost any other modernized nation. There are two main problems, though:
1) The guns are already out there. The US has one of the highest per capita gun ownership rates in the world, and given our population probably has the greatest stockpile of non-military weapons in the world. Being younger than 18 didn’t stop multiple high school students from acquiring guns and going on shooting sprees. They got their firearms elsewhere, likely stolen from parents or the parents of friends. Even underage gang members and convicted felons can buy guns on the black market (aka from anyone willing to sell a firearm illegally to someone).
2) Gun rights are the 2nd amendment in the Constitution. The order may seem like a detail, but that certainly isn’t true when it comes to lobbying and popular opinion. It isn’t quite the same as the 18th amendment (prohibition) which was so quickly thrown out the window. The argument that the right to bear arms was so important to the founding fathers that they felt it should be second only to freedom of religion and speech sounds pretty powerful. It really doesn’t matter that it was written by rebels who had only just overthrown what they saw as a despotic and tyrannical government.
Of course, even if you managed to amend the Constitution and outlaw firearms, which is essentially impossible, you’d still have to deal with the first problem. The real truth of the matter is that these random (and albeit tragic) school shootings aren’t the bulk of gun related homicides in the US. Innocent victims caught in the crossfire of gang wars, victims of robbery, and other lives caught for whatever reason in the intentionally misused gunfire across the US far outnumber those killed in these “high profile� slayings. What seems especially ironic to me is the fact that the vast majority of gun related homicides in the US are caused by handguns, which you have to be 21 to purchase, while the serial killings that far too frequently monopolize the airwaves are caused almost entirely by long guns (aka rifles). And that doesn’t pertain to just campus shootings, but the Beltway Sniper, the infamous Austin, Texas massacre precipitated by a former US Marine, and several other incidents involving shooters well within the age limit to own any type of firearm.
What I’m trying to get at here is that the problem of gun violence in the US doesn’t have some simple solution like raising the minimum age to own a firearm. The issue is too large and too complex to be solved with such trivial measures. The truth is that I, like everyone else who has real concerns about the topic, know that any solution will be both gradual and difficult. A decrease in firearm related homicide will have to be the result of a nationwide sentiment and movement, not some quick fix piece of legislature.
u know the guns topic have been also a problem for them , and they are trying to find the SOU but they can't bannnnnned it cuz people will argue which i consider Stupid because they don't know what they are saying or want to
Joined: Mar 10, 2005 Posts: 6106 Location: Somewhere In SEA
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 1:04 pm Post subject:
in my country to obtain license for gun, u must have a court letter n also a letter of permission from the police if u are in need of a gun........
about all this shooting, it very clear that the authorities in USA or Canada.....did not do enough in educating the young citizens mind, youngster are tend to be so high when they got hold a gun...........
n also recently there is a case where few kids as young as 7 years to 8 years plotting to hold their school teachers as hostage just becoz she corrected them......
disciplinary action alone is not enough, counseling is a must for troubled student, n the school compound can be entered easily by anyone, as there is no guards guarding the front school entrance to inside school areas..........
parents are also not doing enough, nowday parent just work n work neglecting their children problems until it too late for them to notice it. _________________
Related thread here I still think the topic is different enough to keep this open, at least for a while, but bear in mind the other one as well.
Anyway, I don;t think that the solution lies in moving legal age requirements up, since I don't think the problem is young people owning guns; it's stupid people getting access to them. How are you going to regulate that? It doesn't matter how far up you move the legal age if a kid can just steal his dad's gun anyway. Just as effective, and even cheaper than buying.
Moving up the legal age requirement to prevent school shooting would be as effective as selling fans as a permanent solution to global warming.
i agree that moving the age limit would be pointless.
also i don't believe making guns illegal would solve anything
especially since a lot of people already have them
i think that the best way to go about it is to minimize gun exposure to unstable people.
Joined: Mar 10, 2005 Posts: 6106 Location: Somewhere In SEA
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 3:14 am Post subject:
coolskier wrote:
leoxjm wrote:
Related thread here I still think the topic is different enough to keep this open, at least for a while, but bear in mind the other one as well.
Anyway, I don;t think that the solution lies in moving legal age requirements up, since I don't think the problem is young people owning guns; it's stupid people getting access to them. How are you going to regulate that? It doesn't matter how far up you move the legal age if a kid can just steal his dad's gun anyway. Just as effective, and even cheaper than buying.
Moving up the legal age requirement to prevent school shooting would be as effective as selling fans as a permanent solution to global warming.
i agree that moving the age limit would be pointless.
also i don't believe making guns illegal would solve anything
especially since a lot of people already have them
i think that the best way to go about it is to minimize gun exposure to unstable people.
like? can u tell whether the person is stable or not?
even the person is stable but the person may have kids or teenage children, how sure are you that their children will not touch the guns? _________________
Joined: Mar 11, 2005 Posts: 2071 Location: Behind a computer monitor
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 4:07 am Post subject:
take a lesson from our favorite country: japan.
least amount of crime in the world, most probably because most of the crimes go unreported. banning guns or raising the age limit will result in people finding creative solutions. firearms are still an issue in japan despite the prohibitions because of smuggling. murder by melee means (knives, swords, etc.) replace firearms. there was a random stabbing incident a few weeks back although they're really hush hush about senseless violence over there.
what i don't understand is why there are all these run-of-the-mill hack jobs when you're committing domestic mass murder. there are many more efficient methods of causing destruction, especially when you're suicidal. i'd post the methods, but...they're fairly realistic and easy to execute.
it's not gun laws that you have to watch out for, it's solving the bigger problem so that gun control isn't unnecessary.
Joined: Mar 23, 2005 Posts: 173 Location: The Fantisy world in my head that is free of sadness and hate, and away from my depressed life
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:08 am Post subject:
1) Increasing the legal age of gun possetion is a waste of time for these three previously stated reasons a) most of the guns used for these school shootings are the property of their parental units b) these shooting could have easly been avoided if the school's administration had done their proper job of filtering through applications and their required background checks and/or handling the dissigreement. c) it's not that hard to get a firearm in the first place legal or not [url]goole.com[/url]
When depresion or anger hits my music helps me feel nothing, its the greatest feeling in the world, what does happyness feel like, I may never know, but I do know that
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All images and comments are property of their respective owners, all the rest � 2002 by Anime-Source.com.
You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php.