Harry Potter 3

the_dark_akira · Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 3:47 pm Post subject: any one care to help me?

righty hoe then people NE 1 no the name of the next book and the release date and yes the film sucked ............although the actign has improved greatly scince the first movi lol Razz

monster321 · Heimin (Commoner) Joined: Jun 22, 2004 Posts: 57

Though the action increased in the third film. I believe that the first film was the best because i think it included more details from the book then the other two movie.Also i wanted to ask if anyone that the new headmaster was not as good as the first one because many of my friends when they went with me to watch the movie they all thought that they should of chose a better actor for the headmaster.

Himitsu · Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2004 6:21 pm Post subject:

Changed directors? Hmm I found that the third movie sucked compared to the first two, although the time change was quite cool (and mind boggling, how did things work originally?)

But the third movie is great compared to any other crummy general movie we see.

monster321 · Heimin (Commoner) Joined: Jun 22, 2004 Posts: 57

true true well said,but i thought they only changed the director for the fourth chapter of harry potter which isn't released yet. yeah your question for how the time machine worked is very hard to be explained myself because i still don't know if the time repeats themselves and what happen at to harry and hermonie when harry and her came back.

chingu · Yari Ashigaru Joined: Jun 27, 2004 Posts: 349

DogEater008 · Heimin (Commoner) Joined: Jun 27, 2004 Posts: 83

i heard this MOVIE SUCK....but the book is good though

kanako · newbie! Joined: Jul 12, 2004 Posts: 29

i didn't think the movie was that bad. it was actually a lot better compared to the last two which chris columbus directed. but compared to the book, i agree, it's not that good.
_________________
there is no answer. there was no answer. there will be no answer. that is the answer.

devil_1411 · Heimin (Commoner) Joined: Dec 28, 2004 Posts: 50

U min the movie or the books??

spermbank-tycoon · Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 4:56 am Post subject:

Yeah... the mexican director did make it rather crappy. They should read the books carefully first, all of the books. because the setting just doesn't make sense. Where are they going to place the large carrige in the 4th movie? If they alter the setting again i would get p*ssed off.
_________________
[IMG:630:120:ffc1e5676f]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v167/toolowhobo/parassig.gif[/img:ffc1e5676f]

Guest · Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 3:28 pm Post subject:

can't believe it... they missed a lot of scenes, and i hate it when Harry gets the firebolt last, i think the book is much better than the movie.

DrJackal · Jikan Samurai Joined: Mar 14, 2004 Posts: 979

Watched the first two movies of Harry Potter and i thought they sucked. The books are ok though.

sign1000up · Heimin (Commoner) Joined: Dec 28, 2004 Posts: 50

3rd is the best of all the 3 movies.

iceravent · Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:51 am Post subject:

if you read the book then watch the movie u'll no that the events are complete out of order.. in another words not as good. Mad

aSagi · Conscript Joined: Dec 06, 2004 Posts: 131

Craze · Heimin (Commoner) Joined: Oct 05, 2004 Posts: 52

I will never watch any more Harry Potter because the first movie sucked so much a$$ that i hate him, no matter how good the 2nd, 3rd, ect. are
_________________
"Eat not the yellow snow"
--Proverb of great wisdom extracted from a
Bazooka Joe wrapper